An Exploratory Study of the Effective Mediating Artefacts in Listening through Systemic Theoretical Instruction (STI) among English as Foreign Language Learners

Document Type: Original Article

Author

Department of English Language, Yadegar-e- Imam Khomeini (RAH) Shahre Rey Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

This research study investigated the development of listening proficiency level by the aid of different media- tional artifacts in Systemic Theoretical Instruction (STI). The study considered whether exposing learners to different types and various numbers of mediating artefacts would increase their awareness towards listen- ing concepts after two months, and consequently promote their listening performance. To this end, 90 un- dergraduate English as Foreign Language (EFL) Learners, in the field of English Literature and Tra nslation, were recruited in this study. The participants were divided into three experimental groups. The learners in group (I, STI-EM) were exposed to teacher’s oral explanation of the listening concepts along with material- ized tools , which consisted of presenting the listening concepts in charts and images, while group (II, STI- EV) learners were exposed to teacher’s oral explanation of the target concepts and learners’ individual form of verbalization. Learners in group (III, STI-EMV) exposed to all forms of mediation such as teacher’s oral explanation, materialized tools and learners’ verbalization practice. Data were gathered through two listen- ing comprehension tests (pre & post) from learners. Semi-structured interview was then conducted to gain learners’ opinions about this way of instruction. The study lasted 13 weeks, including both listening assess- ments and the enrichment program (EP). The result of the study indicated that learners’ listening improve- ment was detected more in the group who exposed to all forms of mediating artifacts (Group III). While the other two groups (I & II) had approximately the same listening performance. In addition, almost all the learners in three instructional groups were satisfied with STI.
 

Keywords


Ableeva, R. (2010). Dynamic assessment of listening comprehension in second language learning: Pennsylvania State University.

Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 465-483.

Aponte-de-Hanna, C. (2012). Listening Strategies in the L2 Classroom: More Practice, Less Testing. College Quarterly, 15(1), n1.

Brown, H., D. (2001). Teaching by principles an interactive approach to language pedagogy: Pearson: Longman.

Brown, S. (2011). Listening myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching: University of Michigan Press.

Buck, G. (2003). Assessing Listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cutler, A. (2000). Listening to a second language through the ears of a first. Interpreting, 5(1), 1-23.

DiCamilla, F. J., & Antón, M. (2004). Private speech: A study of language for thought in the collaborative interaction of language learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 36-69.

Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition(second edition): Oxford University Press.

Escandón, A., & Sanz, M. (2011). The bottom-up move within Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development: A pedagogical application for teaching agreement in Spanish as a foreign language. RELC journal, 42(3), 345-361.

Ferreira, M. M., & Lantolf, J. P. (2008). A concept-based approach to teaching writing through genre analysis. Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages. London: Equinox, 285-320.

Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (2005). Second language listening: Theory and practice: Cambridge University Press.

Fogal, G. G. (2015). Pedagogical stylistics and concept-based instruction: An investigation into the development of voice in the academic writing of Japanese university students of English. University of Toronto.  

Gal'perin, P. Y. (1989). Study of the intellectual development of the child. Soviet Psychology, 27(3), 26-44.

Gal'perin, P. I. (1992). Stage-by-stage formation as a method of psychological investigation. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 30(4), 60-80.

Garcia Frazier, E. G. (2013). Concept-based teaching and Spanish modality in heritage language learners: A Vygotskyan approach.

Garcia, P. N. (2012). Verbalizing in the second language classroom: The development of the grammatical concept of aspect.

Goh, C. (2014). Second language listening comprehension: Process and pedagogy. Teaching English as a second or foreign language, 72-89.

Graham, S. (2003). Learner strategies and advanced level listening comprehension. Language Learning Journal, 28(1), 64-69.

Graham, S. (2006). Listening comprehension: The learners’ perspective. System, 34(2),182-165  

Graham, S., Santos, D., & Vanderplank, R. (2011). Exploring the relationship between listening development and strategy use. Language Teaching Research, 15(4), 435-456.

Gutiérrez, A. G. (2008). Microgenesis, method and object: A study of collaborative activity in a Spanish as a foreign language classroom. Applied linguistics, 29(1), 120-148.

Harun, H., Massari, N., & Behak, F. P. (2014). Use of L1 as a mediating Tool for Understanding Tense/Aspect Marking in English: An Application of Concept-based Instruction. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134, 134-139.

Hasan, A. S. (2000). Learners' perceptions of listening comprehension problems. Language Culture and Curriculum, 13(2), 137-153.

Haywood, H. C., & Lidz, C. S. (2006). Dynamic assessment in practice: Clinical and educational applications: Cambridge University Press.

Kim, J. (2013). Developing conceptual understanding of sarcasm in a second language through concept-based instruction: Pennsylvania State University.

Knouzi, I., Swain, M., Lapkin, S., & Brooks, L. (2010). Self‐scaffolding mediated by languaging: microgenetic analysis of high and low performers. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 23-49.

Lai, W. (2012). Concept-based foreign language pedagogy: Teaching the Chinese temporal system. The Pennsylvania State University.  

Lantolf, J. P., & Johnson, K. E. (2007). Extending Firth and Wagner's (1997) ontological perspective to L2 classroom praxis and teacher education. The Modern Language Journal, 91(s1), 877-892.

Lantolf, J. P., & Throne, S. L. . (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lapkin, S., Swain, M., & Knouzi, I. (2008). French as a Second Language:University Students Learn the Grammatical Concept of Voice. In J. P.Lantolf & M. E. Poehner (Eds.), Sociocultural Theory and the Teaching of Second Languages (pp. 228-255). London.

Lee, H. (2012). A concept-based approach to second language teaching and learning: Cognitive linguistics-inspired instruction of English phrasal verbs. The Pennsylvania State University: Ph.D. dissertation.

Lund, R. J. (1990). A taxonomy for teaching second language listening. Foreign language annals, 23(2), 105.

Mendelson, D. J. (2000). Learning to Listen: A Strategy Based Approach for Second Language Learner: Dorling Kindersley Limited.

Negueruela, E. (2003). A sociocultural approach to the teaching and learning of second languages: Systemic-theoretical instruction and L2 development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.

Negueruela, E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2006). Concept-based instruction and the acquisition of L2 Spanish. The art of teaching Spanish: Second language acquisition from research to praxis, 79-102.

Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know: Newbury House Publishers.

Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development (Vol. 9): Springer Science & Business Media.

Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2010). Vygotsky's teaching-assessment dialectic and L2 education: The case for dynamic assessment. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 17(4), 312-330.

Serrano-Lopez, M., & Poehner, M. E. (2008). Materializing linguistic concepts through 3-D clay modeling: A tool-and-result approach to mediating L2 Spanish development. Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages, 321-350.

Stafford, C. A. (2013). What’s on your mind? How private speech mediates cognition during initial non-primary language learning. Applied linguistics, 34(2), 151-172.

Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2003). Is there a role for the use of the L1 in an L2 setting?

TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 760-769.

Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. Sociocultural theory and second language learning,. 114,97

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3), 285-304.

Tanka, J., & Baker, L. R. (2004). Interactions 2: listening and speaking (4th edition). Singapore: McGraw-Hill.

Tanka, J., & Most, P. (2007). Interactions 1: Listening and speaking (silver edition): Singapore: McGraw-Hill.

Van Compernolle, R. A. (2012). Developing sociopragmatic capacity in a second language through concept-based instruction (Order No. 3674265). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I. (1618227618).

Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language teaching, 40(03), 191-210.

Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. M. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. New York: Routledge.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes: Harvard university press.

Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and Languag

 (Cambridge, MA, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).

VygotskyThought and Language1986.

Vygotsky, L. S., & Rieber, R. W. (1987). The collected works of LS Vygotsky: Volume 1: Problems of general psychology, including the volume Thinking and Speech (Vol. 1): Springer Science & Business Media.

White, B. J. (2012). A conceptual approach to the instruction of phrasal verbs. The Modern

Yanez-Prieto, C. M. (2008). On literature and the secret art of invisible words:Teaching literature through language(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Pennsylvania State University, PA.