Abadi, E. A. M., & Baradaran, A. (2013). The relationship between learner autonomy and vocabulary learning strategies in Ira-nian EFL learners with different language proficiency level. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Litera-ture, 2(3), 176-185.
Aliakbari, M., & Hayatzadeh, A. (2008). Varia-tion of language strategies among Iranian English students: The effect of gender. In-ternational Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 4(3), 72-87.
Alsadik, H. (2014). A survey study on the vo-cabulary learning strategies used by uni-versity students in south Iraq and their insctructors' awareness levels (Un-published master thesis), Near East Uni-versity, Lefkoşa.
Amirian, R., & Heshmatifar, Z. (2013). A survey on vocabulary learning strategies: A case of Iranian EFL university students. Jour-nal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(3), 636-641.
Asgari, A., & Mustapha, G. B. (2011). The type of vocabulary learning strategies used by ESL students in University Putra Malaysia.
English Language Teaching, 4(2), 84-90.Celuch, K., Black, G., & Warthan, B. (2009).
Student self-identity as a critical thinker: The influence of attitudes, attitude strength, and normative beliefs. Journal of Marketing Education, 31(1), 31-39.
Cohen, A. D. (2007). Coming to terms with lan-guage learner strategies: Surveying the experts. In A. D. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learner strategies: Thir-ty years of research and practice (pp. 29-45). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press
Facione, N. (2013). California Critical Thinking Skills Test Manual. Millbrae: The Cali-fornia Academic Press/Insight Assess-ment.
Facione, P. A. (1990a). The California Critical Thinking Skills Test--College Level. Technical Report# 1. Experimental Vali-dation and Content Validity (pp. 1-14).Millbrae, CA.
Facione, P. A. (1990b). The Delphi report. Criti-cal Thinking: A Statement of Expert Con-sensus for Purposes of Educational As-sessment and Instruction (pp. 1-19).Millbrae, CA
Facione, P. A. (1992). The California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST): Forms A and B and the CCTST Test manual. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press.
Fahim, M., & Ahmadian, M. (2012). Critical thinking and Iranian EFL context. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(4), 793-800.
Fahim, M., Bagherkazemi, M., & Alemi, M. (2010). The relationship between test tak-ers‟ critical thinking ability and their per-formance on the reading section of TOEFL. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(6), 830-837.
Fahim, M., & Komijani, A. (2010). Critical thinking ability, L2 vocabulary knowledge and L2 vocabulary learning strategies. Journal of English studies, 1(1), 23-38.
Fan, M. Y. (2003). Frequency of use, perceived usefulness, and actual usefulness of sec-ond language vocabulary strategies: A study of Hong Kong learners. The Mod-ern Language Journal, 87(2), 222-241.
GhorbanDordiNejad, F., & Heydarib, M. (2012). On the relationship between Iranian EFL students’ critical thinking ability and their reading comprehension micro-skills. Phil-ippine ESL Journal, 9, 24-37.
Griffiths, C. (2003). Patterns of language learning strategy use. System, 31(3), 367-383.
Grosser, M., & Nel, M. (2013). The relationship between the critical thinking skills and the academic language proficiency of pro-spective teachers. South African Journal of Education, 33(2), 1-17.
Hamzah, M., Kafipour, R., & Abdullah, S. K. (2009). Vocabulary learning strategies of Iranian undergraduate EFL students and
Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-58.
Schmidt, R. W. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206-26.
Tomlin, R. S., & Villa, V. (1994). Attention incognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 183-203.
VanPatten, B. (1990): Attending to content and form in the input: An experime consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287-301.
VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex publishing corporation.
VanPatten, B. (2002). Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52(4), 755-803.
VanPatten, B. (2003). From input to output: A teacher’s guide to second language acquisition. Boston: The McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
VanPatten, B. (2004). Input processing in SLA. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research and commentary (pp.5-32). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
VanPatten, B. (2007). Input processing in adult second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Ed.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 115-135). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
VanPatten, B., & Oikkenon, S. (1996). Explanation versus structured input in processing instruction. SSLA, 18, 495-510.
Wong, W. (2001). Modality and attention to meaning and form in the input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 345-368.
Wong, W. (2004). The nature of processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processi instruction: Theory, research and commentary (pp. 33-67). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wong, W. (2005). Input Enhancement: From theory and research to the classroom. NY: McGraw-Hill Companies.